Most Popular
1. Banking Crisis is Stocks Bull Market Buying Opportunity - Nadeem_Walayat
2.The Crypto Signal for the Precious Metals Market - P_Radomski_CFA
3. One Possible Outcome to a New World Order - Raymond_Matison
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
5. Apple AAPL Stock Trend and Earnings Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
6.AI, Stocks, and Gold Stocks – Connected After All - P_Radomski_CFA
7.Stock Market CHEAT SHEET - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.US Debt Ceiling Crisis Smoke and Mirrors Circus - Nadeem_Walayat
9.Silver Price May Explode - Avi_Gilburt
10.More US Banks Could Collapse -- A Lot More- EWI
Last 7 days
Stock Market Volatility (VIX) - 25th Mar 24
Stock Market Investor Sentiment - 25th Mar 24
The Federal Reserve Didn't Do Anything But It Had Plenty to Say - 25th Mar 24
Stock Market Breadth - 24th Mar 24
Stock Market Margin Debt Indicator - 24th Mar 24
It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - 24th Mar 24
Stocks: What to Make of All This Insider Selling- 24th Mar 24
Money Supply Continues To Fall, Economy Worsens – Investors Don’t Care - 24th Mar 24
Get an Edge in the Crypto Market with Order Flow - 24th Mar 24
US Presidential Election Cycle and Recessions - 18th Mar 24
US Recession Already Happened in 2022! - 18th Mar 24
AI can now remember everything you say - 18th Mar 24
Bitcoin Crypto Mania 2024 - MicroStrategy MSTR Blow off Top! - 14th Mar 24
Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - 11th Mar 24
Gold and the Long-Term Inflation Cycle - 11th Mar 24
Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - 11th Mar 24
Two Reasons The Fed Manipulates Interest Rates - 11th Mar 24
US Dollar Trend 2024 - 9th Mar 2024
The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - 9th Mar 2024
Investors Don’t Believe the Gold Rally, Still Prefer General Stocks - 9th Mar 2024
Paper Gold Vs. Real Gold: It's Important to Know the Difference - 9th Mar 2024
Stocks: What This "Record Extreme" Indicator May Be Signaling - 9th Mar 2024
My 3 Favorite Trade Setups - Elliott Wave Course - 9th Mar 2024
Bitcoin Crypto Bubble Mania! - 4th Mar 2024
US Interest Rates - When WIll the Fed Pivot - 1st Mar 2024
S&P Stock Market Real Earnings Yield - 29th Feb 2024
US Unemployment is a Fake Statistic - 29th Feb 2024
U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - 29th Feb 2024
What a Breakdown in Silver Mining Stocks! What an Opportunity! - 29th Feb 2024
Why AI will Soon become SA - Synthetic Intelligence - The Machine Learning Megatrend - 29th Feb 2024
Keep Calm and Carry on Buying Quantum AI Tech Stocks - 19th Feb 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

Panorama: Wi-Fi – A Warning Signal

Politics / Social Issues May 22, 2007 - 11:22 PM GMT

By: BBC

Politics

Wi-fi networks in schools can give off three times the height of the signal radiation of phone masts, a BBC Panorama investigation has discovered.

The Chairman of the Health Protection Agency, Sir William Stewart , calls for a review of the health effects of wi-fi in the programme, to be broadcast tonight on BBC One .


Current Government advice – from a report published by Sir William in 2000 – recommends that phone masts are not sited near schools, without consultation with parents and the school, because children are thought to be more vulnerable to radio frequency radiation emissions than adults.

Panorama visited a comprehensive school in Norwich and measured the radiation signal strength from a classroom wi-fi enabled laptop.

The programme found the height of the signal strength was three-times higher than the height of the signal strength of a typical phone mast.

Children's skulls are still growing and are thinner than adults' – tests have shown children absorb more radiation than adults when using mobile phones – which could raise questions about the safety of children working bent over computers being exposed to radiation at very close-quarters.

The school Panorama visited had nine classrooms with wi-fi nodes in operation, with plans for more.

Seventy per cent of secondary schools in the UK already have wi-fi and nearly 50% of all primary schools do.

Panorama spoke to nearly 50 of those schools and only one had been alerted that there might be possible health risks. Some others had been told that there was no risk.

Sir William Stewart, scientific adviser to the last three governments, says: "I believe that there is a need for a review of the wi-fi and other areas... I think it's timely for it to be done now."

Philip Parkin , General Secretary of the Professional Association of Teachers, says: "I think schools and parents will be very worried about it...

"I am asking for schools to consider very seriously whether they should be installing wi-fi networks now and this will make them think twice or three times before they do it."

The Government says there is no health risk from wi-fi.

It cites the World Health Organisation's view which states there are "no adverse health effects from low level, long-term exposure".

However, Sir William believes they are wrong to stick to that statement: "There is evidence and the Stewart report pointed out some of that evidence."

In 2000 Sir William was commissioned to produce a report to examine mobile phones, masts and health.

Speaking about the findings of that report, in relation to mobile phones, masts and health, he says: "... there may be changes, for example in cognitive function... there were some indications that there may be cancer inductions... there was some molecular biology changes within the cell and these were issues that we had to bear in mind."

The levels of radiation Panorama found in the Norwich classroom are 600 times lower than the levels deemed dangerous by the Government.

The Government relies on the data supplied by ICNIRP, an international group of scientists, for radiation safety limits.

However ICNIRP does not take into account biological effects of radio frequency radiation and bases exposure limits on a thermal effect.

In other words, the radiation has to be so strong it causes a heat affect before it is restricted.

Professor Henry Lai of Washington University is a biologist respected by both sides of the argument.

He did his own review of all the experiments on mobile phone to see how many found an effect. He has found health effects at similar levels of radiation to wi-fi in over 30 years of research.

He says: "I think it's about 50-50; 50% found an effect and 50% did not find an effect at all."

"I think it's irresponsible to just set standards using a thermal standard... if you set it just based on a thermal effect you are neglecting a large amount of data."

Dr Olle Johansson of the world-renowned Karolinska Institute in Sweden has also carried out experiments on radiation similar or lower than wi-fi and found biological effects.

When asked if the ICNIRP is right to set limits based on thermal effect, the doctor says: "That's just rubbish, I would say, you know. You cannot, er, put any er, emphasis on such guidelines."

Panorama asked the Government for an interview on the issue but was referred back to the Health Protection Agency, the Chairman of which is Sir William Stewart, the man who has told Panorama he is uncomfortable with the speed with which wi-fi is being rolled out.

Panorama: Wi-Fi – A Warning Signal, Monday 21 May 2007, 8.30pm, BBC One

By BBC News Publicity


© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in