Obama Goes Wobbly Over More Economic Stimulus
Economics / Economic Stimulus Nov 01, 2009 - 06:34 AM GMTBy: Mike_Whitney
The recession is over. Thursdays report from the Commerce Dept. confirmed   that the economy expanded in the third quarter by 3.5 percent, better than most   economists estimates. GDP had contracted in the four previous quarters in the   longest and deepest recession since the Great Depression. Massive government   stimulus, cash for clunkers, and inventory restocking accounted for most of the   surge in economic activity. 
Consumer spending grew at 2.36 percent while   consumer credit continued to contract at a near-record pace of 4.5 percent.   Unemployment swelled to 9.8 percent, "with nearly nearly 26 million workers—17   percent of the workforce—unemployed or underemployed," according to economist   Mark Zandi. The economy remains extremely weak and is expected to lapse back   into recession if the Obama administration fails to provide a second-round of   stimulus. 
  
  But President Barack Obama hasn't requested more stimulus and   recent polls indicate that a majority of people are against more deficit   spending. The administration has done a poor job of explaining the advantages of   reducing the output-gap or--for that matter--the overall objectives of Obama's   economic recovery plan. Many people heap the bank bailouts (TARP) with the   fiscal stimulus. This is a mistake that's easy to make. But the point needs to   be clarified so more people don't needlessly suffer. It's up to Obama to   articulate the differences in policy so the country can muddle through the tough   days ahead. The problem is, Obama is afraid to use his skills as a communicator,   because he thinks his message will offend financial industry constituents who   wield tremendous power at the White House and on Capital Hill. The bankers and   brokerage mandarins are more than happy with the present arrangement, which   means that the conveyor-belt connecting the US Treasury to Wall Street will   continue to operate at full-throttle diverting ungodly sums of money to broken   banks and financial institutions rather than for unemployment benefits, work   programs, and state aid. 
  
  Obama supporters who think that the president   is right to treat the banks with kid gloves, should consider how Franklin   Roosevelt dealt with the same situation 70 years ago. His first Inaugural   Address, March 4, 1933, sums it up pretty well: 
  
  "Practices of the   unscrupulous money changers stand indicted in the court of public opinion,   rejected by the hearts and minds of men....Faced by failure of credit they have   proposed only the lending of more money. Stripped of the lure of profit by which   to induce our people to follow their false leadership, they have resorted to   exhortations, pleading tearfully for restored confidence. They know only the   rules of a generation of self-seekers. They have no vision, and when there is no   vision the people perish." (Source: Franklin D. Roosevelt, Inaugural Address,   March 4, 1933)
  
  Or, this from FDR:
  
  “Appraising the situation in the   bitter dawn of a cold morning after, what do we find? We find two-thirds of   American industry concentrated in a few hundred corporations…We find more than   half of the savings of the country invested in corporate stocks and bonds, and   made the sport of the American stock market. We find fewer than three dozen   private banking houses, and stock-selling adjuncts of commercial banks,   directing the flow of American capital. In other words, we find concentrated   economic power in a few hands…We find a great part of our working population   with no chance of earning a living except by grace of this concentrated   industrial machine; and we find that millions and millions of Americans are out   of work, throwing upon the already burdened Government the necessity of   relief…We find the Republican leaders proposing no solution except more debts,   more conferences under the same bewildered leadership, more Government money in   business but no Government attempt to wrestle with basic problems…I believe that   our industrial and economic system is made for individual men and women, and not   individual men and women for the benefit of the system.” (Thanks to counterpunch   contributor Pam Marten for FDR quote   http://www.counterpunch.org/martens10312008.html)
  
  Clearly, FDR understood   type of people he was dealing with. 
  
  Obama needs to stop pussyfooting and   toughen-up. This isn't the time for grandiloquent oratory or Utopian claptrap.   People have lost their jobs, their homes, their savings. The shelters are   bulging, the food banks are maxed out, and the unemployment lines are stretched   from one coast to the other. Here's a clip from the New York Times making the   case for more stimulus: 
  
  "The economy is going to need more government   support, or it is bound to be very weak for a very long time — and vulnerable to   a relapse into recession. Unemployment is expected to worsen well into next   year, exceeding 10 percent. Foreclosures are expected to rise, which will push   home values down further. Hundreds of small and midsize banks are likely to fail   in coming years. State and local governments face budget shortfalls in 2010 that   are as bad or worse than this year’s.
  
  Yet Washington is not providing a   coherent plan for effective stimulus. The Senate has been hamstrung for nearly a   month over the most basic relief-and-recovery boost: an extension of   unemployment benefits. ... Lawmakers in both parties fret that large budget   deficits preclude more stimulus, lest the burden of debt outweigh the benefit of   deficit spending. ... Deficits are a serious issue, but the immediate need for   stimulus trumps the longer-term need for deficit reduction. A self-reinforcing   stretch of economic weakness would be far costlier than additional stimulus."   ("The Case for more Stimulus", New York Times editorial) 
  
Sure, the   public is worried about the ballooning deficits; they should be. But that   shouldn't stop Obama from doing the right thing and making the case for another   round of stimulus. His job is to strengthen demand and put the country back to   work. The rest is just politics. 
By Mike Whitney
Email: fergiewhitney@msn.com
Mike is a well respected freelance writer living in Washington state, interested in politics and economics from a libertarian perspective.
 Mike Whitney Archive  | 
  
© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.
	

  