Most Popular
1. It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- Gary_Tanashian
2.Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
3. Bitcoin S&P Pattern - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
4.U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - Raymond_Matison
5. How to Profit from the Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - Part1 - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - Nadeem_Walayat
9.It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - Stephen_McBride
10.Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - Richard_Mills
Last 7 days
Friday Stock Market CRASH Following Israel Attack on Iranian Nuclear Facilities - 19th Apr 24
All Measures to Combat Global Warming Are Smoke and Mirrors! - 18th Apr 24
Cisco Then vs. Nvidia Now - 18th Apr 24
Is the Biden Administration Trying To Destroy the Dollar? - 18th Apr 24
S&P Stock Market Trend Forecast to Dec 2024 - 16th Apr 24
No Deposit Bonuses: Boost Your Finances - 16th Apr 24
Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - 8th Apr 24
Gold Is Rallying Again, But Silver Could Get REALLY Interesting - 8th Apr 24
Media Elite Belittle Inflation Struggles of Ordinary Americans - 8th Apr 24
Profit from the Roaring AI 2020's Tech Stocks Economic Boom - 8th Apr 24
Stock Market Election Year Five Nights at Freddy's - 7th Apr 24
It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- 7th Apr 24
AI Revolution and NVDA: Why Tough Going May Be Ahead - 7th Apr 24
Hidden cost of US homeownership just saw its biggest spike in 5 years - 7th Apr 24
What Happens To Gold Price If The Fed Doesn’t Cut Rates? - 7th Apr 24
The Fed is becoming increasingly divided on interest rates - 7th Apr 24
The Evils of Paper Money Have no End - 7th Apr 24
Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - 3rd Apr 24
Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend - 2nd Apr 24
Dow Stock Market Annual Percent Change Analysis 2024 - 2nd Apr 24
Bitcoin S&P Pattern - 31st Mar 24
S&P Stock Market Correlating Seasonal Swings - 31st Mar 24
S&P SEASONAL ANALYSIS - 31st Mar 24
Here's a Dirty Little Secret: Federal Reserve Monetary Policy Is Still Loose - 31st Mar 24
Tandem Chairman Paul Pester on Fintech, AI, and the Future of Banking in the UK - 31st Mar 24
Stock Market Volatility (VIX) - 25th Mar 24
Stock Market Investor Sentiment - 25th Mar 24
The Federal Reserve Didn't Do Anything But It Had Plenty to Say - 25th Mar 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

How the Soviet Union Nearly Lost Russia It's Vodka

Politics / US Politics Feb 04, 2013 - 09:52 AM GMT

By: Pravda

Politics

Russian vodka is a word combination that everyone is familiar with. Vodka is a product that represents Russia on the international market. Around the world, many people believe that vodka can be only Russian. However, there was an incident, when Russia had to prove its "copyright" for the beverage at court. At first, the brand attracted the attention of descendants of Russian immigrants. Afterwards, Poland stated that vodka was its national product.


In the autumn of 1977, there was a national issue discussed. Does the USSR has the right to produce a product called "vodka"? The West began to question the right of the Soviet Union for the production of the beverage. The lawsuit was far-fetched. West entrepreneurs wanted to appropriate the profits from the sales of vodka. A number of Soviet vodka brands were boycotted in order to prevent "the illicit enrichment of plagiarists." A number of American companies began to claim the right to use the name "vodka." They would assure everyone that they began to produce vodka before the USSR.

The reputation of a great power was severely shaken together with economic interests. With no vodka exports, the state budget could lose a lot. If the U.S. would have proved the validity of its claims, they would have banned the Soviet Union from using the name "vodka." Moreover, the West would have banned the production of the beverage under any other name in the USSR. Even selling vodka in the Soviet Union would have been impossible without USA's permission.

Initially, Soviet foreign trade organizations initially treated such claims with haughty condescension. Many Russian industrialists fled from the revolution to the U.S., where they opened vodka-making companies (in 1918 and later). In the Soviet Union, according to the decree from the Central Executive Committee of the Communist Party, the industrial production of vodka was started only after 26 August 1923.

In December 1917, the Soviet government banned the production of vodka in the country. Vodka had not been produced for six years. However, the "dry law" was introduced by Nicholas II after World War I. Afterwards, the ban for the production and trade of spirit and vodka products was extended by the Provisional Government.

Therefore, the Soviet Union did not ban anything, but only confirmed the previously existing regulations regarding "a temporary ban on vodka." It proved the continuity of the state monopoly and its right to suspend, interrupt and resume the production on their own. Therefore, the date of 26 August 1923 had no relation to the beginning of the production of vodka in the Union, nor did it have anything to do with the question of the priority of the name "vodka" as the name appeared long before 1923.

Therefore, the international arbitration court ordered the countries, claiming authorship and exclusive use of the traditional Russian name, to provide convincing evidence to prove that vodka was actually invented on their territory. All foreign vodka companies immediately withdrew their claims to priority of the invention of the Russian vodka.

The first victory was not easy at all for our country. The Ministry of Foreign Trade was thrilled with the victory and acted light-mindedly afterwards. No one expected a stab in the back from the brotherly Poland.

Poland stated that Poland's territory was a territory of the Kingdom of Poland, the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, which included the Great and Little Poland, Mazovia, Kuyavia, Pomerania, Galicia, Volhynia, Podolia, Ukraine and Zaporozhye Sich. The Poles declared that vodka was invented on those territories and was produced on the Polish territory before it came to the Russian Empire, Muscovy, Old Russia and so on. Therefore, the Poles claimed, the right to sell and advertise products on the international market under the name "vodka" belonged only to Poland, while the Soviet goods "Moskovskaya Osobaya", "Stolichnaya", "Russkaya", "Pshenichnaya" and other export vodkas, had to be renamed, because they were supposed to be deprived of the right to be called "vodka." Poland had a vested interest in obtaining international monopoly on the product.

The Soviet Ministry for Foreign Trade did not attach any significance to the threat. How could anyone seriously consider a claim from a member state of the socialist camp? What nonsense!

However, the global market does not take into account such notion as tradition. It requires legally, history-proven and very reliable evidence that establishes the date of the invention of vodka, the first export of the product abroad and the commencement of commercial production. Only exact dates confirm the right of ownership.

The production of all types of Western spirits had a fixed date: cognac - 1334, British gin and whiskey - 1485; Scotch whiskey - 1490-1494; schnapps (German brantwein) - 1520-1522. This is worldwide practice, and no one was going to make an exception for vodka.

The world market considers itself a democrat: the rights are the same both for a great power, and for a small European country. "Historical tradition", "common practice" was nothing but emotions, unworthy of discussion. The market is rigorous and practical - everything has to be documented. The arguments of the Soviet side - "the whole world knows," "it always has been so" - were rejected.

The date of the invention of vodka had to be provided not only by Poland, but also by the Soviet Union to establish the truth. The court had to decide which country had the right to be the sole producer of the product.

In early 1978, the parties were given time to gather evidence. The Soviet Ministry of Foreign Trade was still unaware of the seriousness of the situation. Soviet officials thought that the issue of priority of the name "vodka" was not serious. They thought that it was an easy task that one person could quickly handle. After six months of fruitless research, it turned out that there was neither the date of the start of the production of vodka, nor the literature on the history of its production. Even state archives had no information about the invention of vodka.

The Ministry of Foreign Trade finally realized that the issue was unusually complex, and that its solution required the support of experts. A research had been conducted by the spring of 1979. The research contained detailed answers about the invention date of the beverage, and also explained the reason why it happened at that particular moment of time. Poland failed to prove that "gorzalka" was created before the middle of the XVI century. The International Arbitration Court found the arguments about the creation of vodka in Russia in the mid XV century convincing.

In 1439, monk Isidor of Chudov Monastery, located on the territory of the Moscow Kremlin, created the first recipe of the Russian vodka. He became the author of a brand new alcoholic drink, because he had appropriate education, curiosity and distilling equipment.

Already in 1533, the state introduced a monopoly on the production and sale of vodka in "tsar's taverns." In 1982, by the decision of the International Court of Arbitration, the Soviet Union received the right to create original Russian vodka as a drink.

Thanks to the litigation that the USSR won in 1982, there are museums of vodka in Russia. In Uglich, the hometown of vodka king Smirnov, the supplier of the Imperial Household since 1866, the Municipal Museum of the History of Russian vodka opened in 1998. The Museum of Russian vodka opened in Smolensk in 2003. Another museum of vodka was located in St. Petersburg before 2006 and then was transferred to Moscow.

Maria Chekhovskaya

Pravda.ru

Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.

Pravda Archive

© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in