Most Popular
1. It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- Gary_Tanashian
2.Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
3. Bitcoin S&P Pattern - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
4.U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - Raymond_Matison
5. How to Profit from the Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - Part1 - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - Nadeem_Walayat
9.It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - Stephen_McBride
10.Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - Richard_Mills
Last 7 days
It's Five Nights at Freddy's Again! - 12th Jan 25
Squid Game Stock Market 2025 - 5th Jan 25
Stock Market Bubble Drivers, Crypto Exit Strategy During Musk Presidency - 27th Dec 24
Gold Stocks’ Remain Exceptionally Weak Even as Stocks Rise - 27th Dec 24
Gold’s Remarkable Year - 27th Dec 24
Stock Market Rip the Face Off the Bears Rally! - 22nd Dec 24
STOP LOSSES - 22nd Dec 24
Fed Tests Gold Price Upleg - 22nd Dec 24
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: Why Do We Rely On News - 22nd Dec 24
Never Buy an IPO - 22nd Dec 24
THEY DON'T RING THE BELL AT THE CRPTO MARKET TOP! - 20th Dec 24
CEREBUS IPO NVIDIA KILLER? - 18th Dec 24
Nvidia Stock 5X to 30X - 18th Dec 24
LRCX Stock Split - 18th Dec 24
Stock Market Expected Trend Forecast - 18th Dec 24
Silver’s Evolving Market: Bright Prospects and Lingering Challenges - 18th Dec 24
Extreme Levels of Work-for-Gold Ratio - 18th Dec 24
Tesla $460, Bitcoin $107k, S&P 6080 - The Pump Continues! - 16th Dec 24
Stock Market Risk to the Upside! S&P 7000 Forecast 2025 - 15th Dec 24
Stock Market 2025 Mid Decade Year - 15th Dec 24
Sheffield Christmas Market 2024 Is a Building Site - 15th Dec 24
Got Copper or Gold Miners? Watch Out - 15th Dec 24
Republican vs Democrat Presidents and the Stock Market - 13th Dec 24
Stock Market Up 8 Out of First 9 months - 13th Dec 24
What Does a Strong Sept Mean for the Stock Market? - 13th Dec 24
Is Trump the Most Pro-Stock Market President Ever? - 13th Dec 24
Interest Rates, Unemployment and the SPX - 13th Dec 24
Fed Balance Sheet Continues To Decline - 13th Dec 24
Trump Stocks and Crypto Mania 2025 Incoming as Bitcoin Breaks Above $100k - 8th Dec 24
Gold Price Multiple Confirmations - Are You Ready? - 8th Dec 24
Gold Price Monster Upleg Lives - 8th Dec 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

Why the Gold Standard is Still Relevant

Commodities / Gold and Silver 2013 Jul 09, 2013 - 02:11 PM GMT

By: Money_Morning

Commodities

Tony Daltorio writes: This history of the gold standard explains why there's a growing group of advocates calling for its return...

President Herbert Hoover made a statement in 1933 that rang true for centuries and still rings true today for many: "We have gold because we cannot trust governments."


Hoover was talking about how governments have never been able to resist the temptation to inflate the amount of paper money issued until that paper money becomes nearly worthless. Gold, meanwhile, has been a reliable preserver of wealth for literally centuries.

Some nations have tried to meld the two together - gold and paper money - through the use of what is called the gold standard.

A gold standard is a monetary system where paper money is directly convertible into a fixed amount of gold. In other words, the value of paper money is backed by gold.

England was the first country to adopt such a monetary system in 1822 and its use soon spread around the world, including in the United States.

United States' Bi-Metallic System

Congress established the U.S. Mint in 1792, defining the value of the U.S. dollar in terms of a specific weight of gold and silver: a bi-metallic standard.

But when the United States devalued the dollar versus gold - from $19.39 per ounce to $20.67 an ounce - the U.S. shifted in effect to a gold standard system.

Under this system, it was not a requirement for banks to hold 100% of their deposit and paper money liabilities in gold or silver bullion. But banks were expected to hold enough bullion in their reserves in order to redeem them on demand for gold or silver at the official prices.

This 'requirement' stopped banks from over-issuing paper money, keeping monetary inflation in check. This gold standard feature is a favorite of its advocates today.

The Civil War, and all the spending for the War, disrupted the United States bi-metallic system. But in 1879, the country did go back to a metallic standard.

This time, however, it was a gold-only standard. Silver was relegated to use in small denomination money only. That move was not without a lot of political controversy though.

In 1896, Democrat party candidate William Jennings Bryan ran a populist campaign against gold and for using a silver standard system. Since there was more silver available than gold, it was felt the silver standard system would be less deflationary and less harsh on debtors.

U.S. Gold Standard System History: Surviving the Fed

The gold standard prevailed, though, and even survived its next obstacle...

When the Federal Reserve was established in 1913 as the issue of paper money, it was expected to work within the framework of the gold standard system.

The official gold standard ended in the United States on June 5, 1933 with the passage of the Emergency Banking Act. This legislation, put forward by President Franklin D. Roosevelt and approved by Congress, forced all Americans to convert their gold coins, bullion, and other financial instruments for U.S. dollars.

President Roosevelt also changed the official gold price from the long-standing $20.67 an ounce to $35 per ounce. This allowed the Federal Reserve, which had received all the gold the public gave up, to inflate its balance sheet and, in turn, the money supply.

This was a classic Keynesian economic remedy to combat the ravages of the Great Depression.

As World War II was ending in 1944, the leading western nations put together what was called the Bretton Woods Agreement.

It was a modified gold standard. Other countries pegged the value of their currency to that of the U.S. dollar. The United States, which held 75% of the world's gold reserves at the time, would then convert dollars to gold for foreign central banks. Gold was rarely exchanged, however, with most trading occurring in the currencies themselves.

The final nail in the gold standard's coffin came on August 15, 1971, when President Richard Nixon announced that the United States would no longer convert dollars into gold bullion.

A number of nations, led by Charles DeGaulle's France, were exchanging their dollar for gold as rapidly as they could at that time. DeGaulle wanted a full return to a gold standard system and a move away from U.S. dominance under the Bretton Woods Agreement.

Some gold standard followers have pointed to the recent move by Germany's Bundesbank to repatriate German gold from U.S. vaults as similar to what DeGaulle did decades ago.

A Return to the Gold Standard?

So is Germany's move the first step to a modern-day return of the gold standard?

Perhaps so, as many of the conservative political persuasion are pushing for such a return to monetary discipline.

But the key question is what form would a gold standard system take today?

A study conducted by the Bank of England in 2011 gave some clues. It found that economic growth under the modified gold standard, Bretton Woods, was superior (2.8%) than on a non-gold standard (1.8%) and to the old gold standard (1.3%).

The study also found lower inflation rates and fewer banking crises when some form of a gold standard is in place than when there is no gold standard.

The authors of the study wrote, "Overall the gold standard appeared to perform reasonably well against its financial stability and allocative efficiency objectives."

Steve Forbes points to a practical version of the gold standard for possible use today introduced by Texas Republican Representative Ted Poe.

Under this version of the gold standard, the dollar would again be fixed to gold at a specific price. If gold moves below that fixed price, the Federal Reserve would add money to the financial system by purchasing bonds much as it is doing currently.

However, if gold moves above that fixed price, the Fed would be required to sell bonds from its portfolio, therefore removing money from the financial system.

Many worry that this will choke off economic growth just when an economy is gathering steam.

But this is not necessarily true. Forbes points out that under the Bretton Woods de facto gold standard system, Japan's economy blossomed in the 1950s and 1960s, growing at a 10% rate. Money supply grew in the country enough to fuel the economic boom.

The crucial factor to any future gold standard will be at what price of gold would the U.S. dollar be set. A wrong fixed price set for the gold to dollar ratio may set off either inflation or deflation.

Will we ever see some sort of gold standard again?

Perhaps. Heavy gold-buying by emerging market central banks, coupled with Germany wanting to repatriate its gold, says that more and more countries are taking a look at the long-term value of gold...

What do you think: Is it time to return to the gold standard?

Some argue the world has already returned to the gold standard - just in a stealth way that failed to hit your radar: The Secret Return to the "Gold Standard"

Source :http://moneymorning.com/2013/07/05/a-history-of-the-gold-standard/

Money Morning/The Money Map Report

©2013 Monument Street Publishing. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), of content from this website, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Monument Street Publishing. 105 West Monument Street, Baltimore MD 21201, Email: customerservice@moneymorning.com

Disclaimer: Nothing published by Money Morning should be considered personalized investment advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investent advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security recommended to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication, or after the mailing of printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended by Money Morning should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Money Morning Archive

© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in