Most Popular
1. Banking Crisis is Stocks Bull Market Buying Opportunity - Nadeem_Walayat
2.The Crypto Signal for the Precious Metals Market - P_Radomski_CFA
3. One Possible Outcome to a New World Order - Raymond_Matison
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
5. Apple AAPL Stock Trend and Earnings Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
6.AI, Stocks, and Gold Stocks – Connected After All - P_Radomski_CFA
7.Stock Market CHEAT SHEET - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.US Debt Ceiling Crisis Smoke and Mirrors Circus - Nadeem_Walayat
9.Silver Price May Explode - Avi_Gilburt
10.More US Banks Could Collapse -- A Lot More- EWI
Last 7 days
Stock Market Volatility (VIX) - 25th Mar 24
Stock Market Investor Sentiment - 25th Mar 24
The Federal Reserve Didn't Do Anything But It Had Plenty to Say - 25th Mar 24
Stock Market Breadth - 24th Mar 24
Stock Market Margin Debt Indicator - 24th Mar 24
It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - 24th Mar 24
Stocks: What to Make of All This Insider Selling- 24th Mar 24
Money Supply Continues To Fall, Economy Worsens – Investors Don’t Care - 24th Mar 24
Get an Edge in the Crypto Market with Order Flow - 24th Mar 24
US Presidential Election Cycle and Recessions - 18th Mar 24
US Recession Already Happened in 2022! - 18th Mar 24
AI can now remember everything you say - 18th Mar 24
Bitcoin Crypto Mania 2024 - MicroStrategy MSTR Blow off Top! - 14th Mar 24
Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - 11th Mar 24
Gold and the Long-Term Inflation Cycle - 11th Mar 24
Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - 11th Mar 24
Two Reasons The Fed Manipulates Interest Rates - 11th Mar 24
US Dollar Trend 2024 - 9th Mar 2024
The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - 9th Mar 2024
Investors Don’t Believe the Gold Rally, Still Prefer General Stocks - 9th Mar 2024
Paper Gold Vs. Real Gold: It's Important to Know the Difference - 9th Mar 2024
Stocks: What This "Record Extreme" Indicator May Be Signaling - 9th Mar 2024
My 3 Favorite Trade Setups - Elliott Wave Course - 9th Mar 2024
Bitcoin Crypto Bubble Mania! - 4th Mar 2024
US Interest Rates - When WIll the Fed Pivot - 1st Mar 2024
S&P Stock Market Real Earnings Yield - 29th Feb 2024
US Unemployment is a Fake Statistic - 29th Feb 2024
U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - 29th Feb 2024
What a Breakdown in Silver Mining Stocks! What an Opportunity! - 29th Feb 2024
Why AI will Soon become SA - Synthetic Intelligence - The Machine Learning Megatrend - 29th Feb 2024
Keep Calm and Carry on Buying Quantum AI Tech Stocks - 19th Feb 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

Energy Foreign Ownership Translates into Higher Electric Bills

Companies / Electricity Mar 02, 2016 - 07:54 AM GMT

By: BATR

Companies

What exactly is a public utility? If you listen to the government officials in New York State, a foreign company is just dandy and will qualify from the Public Service Commission as a provider of electricity. While this may be old news, the continued adverse fallout from foreign ownership can no longer be flittered away. The latest approval of rate increases goes as an example of how the entire political favoritism system operates. The Buffalo N.Y. News reports, You’re likely to see higher electric bills soon.


“That proposed rate increase, averaging slightly more than 2 percent annually over three years, would add $5.19 to the average bill of a residential customer using 600 kilowatt hours of electricity, boosting it to $85.75 from $80.56 today, said Clay Ellis, a NYSEG spokesman.”

Remember the citizen reaction when, Iberdrola bought Energy East for $4.5 billion? If you forgot, the public rate payers put up a vigorous opposition that gained traction with the administrative judge at the public hearings. However, you can always count on the big nose of greedy politicians to place their thumb on the scales.

“Chuckie Schumer escorted Iberdrola in the back door here in New York State when he lobbied for the Sale of Energy East (NYSEG & RG&E here in WNY) TO Iberdrola back in 2007”

So explain why a sitting U.S. Senator has standing to compel state officials into approving a foreign corporation from an acquisition that the public was so vehemently against?

Once the Spanish company got in the door, more acquisitions occurred. Iberdrola Buys U.S. Power and Gas Distributor UIL.

“Iberdrola said the deal would help implement its growth plans in the U.S. through 2016, seeking to increase the company’s local footprint and a stronger focus on regulated businesses with stable cash flows.

Iberdrola U.S.A. also has the second-largest wind power generation portfolio in the U.S.”

Here is the real rub and the hidden motivation for giving favorable treatment to a foreign company. The miserable failure of industrial wind electric generation is so well established that most politicians are now reluctant to even mention the pie in the sky benefits from this extremely expensive and unreliable method of generation.

Examine the argument by Mary Kay Barton in Wind Power Destruction in New York State: ‘Clean’ Power Plan Problem, for a well thought out outline why wind power has been a total bust for the all the money spent on pushing it down the throats of beleaguered residents. Only the pockets of crooked officials are lined as Iberdrola runs away with cash while bleeding necessary maintenance dry.  

Add to this litany of real world objections, the ruthless record documented in the article, Iberdrola competition fine manipulate the price of electricity.

“The National Commission on Competition and Markets (CNMC) has imposed a fine of 25 million euros to Iberdrola Generación by manipulating the price of electricity, which is considered a very serious behavior.

Specifically, Iberdrola sanction relates to the actions carried out by increasing the price on the c Hydraulic entrales de Duero, Tagus and Sil, between 30 November 2013 and 23 December 2013.

Article 60th) 54/119 15 of the Act determines the electricity sector as a very serious offense any tampering aimed to alter the price of electricity or measuring the quantities delivered.”

I’m shocked, SHOCKED – Iberdrola penalized for fixing the price of electricity? Tell me this could not happen.

Over a year ago the report in the Democrat and Chronicle by Steven Orr, Electricity costs soar indicates:

“Residential customers served by Rochester Gas and Electric Corp. and New York State Electric and Gas Corp., both owned by Iberdrola SA, are not as bad off as others. Their average residential electric rates so far this month are 8 percent and 10 percent higher than January's, respectively. They've risen 15 percent and 16 percent since December, according to information on the companies' websites.

But customers of National Grid were warned several weeks ago that their electric costs could go up as much as 27 percent in the latest bills. The company reached a deal with New York state regulators that will allow it to spread those extra costs out over a number of months.

National Grid, the two Iberdrola companies and other investor-owned utilities in New York buy electricity and gas in the marketplace and pass it on to customers with no markup. The utilities make their money on delivery charges.”

Now National Grid is a UK company and Iberdrola a Spanish outfit, it is a convenience for these foreign companies to just provide delivery services and let the cost of electricity be a separate charge. The grid is limited in its capacity. Companies from Spain and the UK have long experience with industrial wind generation. Both know well, without massive government subsidies, the industry would never exist. Wind turbines only run on electricity, when the breezes stop blowing.

The True costs of wind electricity, concludes:

“We can only approximate the ‘true’ cost of wind, and how much the reality differs from ‘official’ EIA (and industry) claims. Wind resources have often been presented in a far more favorable light than they deserve. Looking at the costs presented here they are far higher than can be justified. It has been hoped that subsidies would make wind self-sustaining in short order, but wind appears no closer to economic viability today than years ago.”

When a foreign company with vast wind experience buys companies within the United States, they know wind turbines are a loser. Hey, so what, they say. They make their money on distribution services, which is determined by adding charges on base price of the electric. This lack of concern for the actual cost of the  wind generated power inevitably raises the cost of electricity to the end users. The system is structured to pass on these excessive costs to the consumer.

Welcome to the “PUBLIC UTILITY” culture brought to you by your corrupt elected officials and their obedient public service administration. At least if the electric user is to suffer under the hands of a greedy utility, can’t New York State regulate a domestic company?

James Hall

Source: http://www.batr.org/corporatocracy/030216.html

Discuss or comment about this essay on the BATR Forum

http://www.batr.org

"Many seek to become a Syndicated Columnist, while the few strive to be a Vindicated Publisher"

© 2016 Copyright BATR - All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors

BATR Archive

© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in