Most Popular
1. It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- Gary_Tanashian
2.Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
3. Bitcoin S&P Pattern - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
4.U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - Raymond_Matison
5. How to Profit from the Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - Part1 - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - Nadeem_Walayat
9.It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - Stephen_McBride
10.Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - Richard_Mills
Last 7 days
Stock Market Rip the Face Off the Bears Rally! - 22nd Dec 24
STOP LOSSES - 22nd Dec 24
Fed Tests Gold Price Upleg - 22nd Dec 24
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: Why Do We Rely On News - 22nd Dec 24
Never Buy an IPO - 22nd Dec 24
THEY DON'T RING THE BELL AT THE CRPTO MARKET TOP! - 20th Dec 24
CEREBUS IPO NVIDIA KILLER? - 18th Dec 24
Nvidia Stock 5X to 30X - 18th Dec 24
LRCX Stock Split - 18th Dec 24
Stock Market Expected Trend Forecast - 18th Dec 24
Silver’s Evolving Market: Bright Prospects and Lingering Challenges - 18th Dec 24
Extreme Levels of Work-for-Gold Ratio - 18th Dec 24
Tesla $460, Bitcoin $107k, S&P 6080 - The Pump Continues! - 16th Dec 24
Stock Market Risk to the Upside! S&P 7000 Forecast 2025 - 15th Dec 24
Stock Market 2025 Mid Decade Year - 15th Dec 24
Sheffield Christmas Market 2024 Is a Building Site - 15th Dec 24
Got Copper or Gold Miners? Watch Out - 15th Dec 24
Republican vs Democrat Presidents and the Stock Market - 13th Dec 24
Stock Market Up 8 Out of First 9 months - 13th Dec 24
What Does a Strong Sept Mean for the Stock Market? - 13th Dec 24
Is Trump the Most Pro-Stock Market President Ever? - 13th Dec 24
Interest Rates, Unemployment and the SPX - 13th Dec 24
Fed Balance Sheet Continues To Decline - 13th Dec 24
Trump Stocks and Crypto Mania 2025 Incoming as Bitcoin Breaks Above $100k - 8th Dec 24
Gold Price Multiple Confirmations - Are You Ready? - 8th Dec 24
Gold Price Monster Upleg Lives - 8th Dec 24
Stock & Crypto Markets Going into December 2024 - 2nd Dec 24
US Presidential Election Year Stock Market Seasonal Trend - 29th Nov 24
Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past - 29th Nov 24
Gold After Trump Wins - 29th Nov 24
The AI Stocks, Housing, Inflation and Bitcoin Crypto Mega-trends - 27th Nov 24
Gold Price Ahead of the Thanksgiving Weekend - 27th Nov 24
Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast to June 2025 - 24th Nov 24
Stocks, Bitcoin and Crypto Markets Breaking Bad on Donald Trump Pump - 21st Nov 24
Gold Price To Re-Test $2,700 - 21st Nov 24
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: This Is My Strong Warning To You - 21st Nov 24
Financial Crisis 2025 - This is Going to Shock People! - 21st Nov 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

Too Much Capital

Stock-Markets / Economic Theory Jul 17, 2017 - 05:02 PM GMT

By: Submissions

Stock-Markets

Henri Schneider writes: Truisms and banalities: Investors must be able to assess the productivity of their capital. This is done by comparing returns to interest rates. But what, if all interest rates are rigged? What if they are artificially lower than they should be? Then, not only too much capital is invested, but it is invested in the wrong places. Even more pressing: what if there is simply too much capital in the financial system?


For sure, financial markets are up, investors are happy, politicians – central bankers just being a peculiar type of politicians – enjoy the merriment. But the population of question marks regarding the actual cycle is also increasing.

Is there real investment appetite in financial markets or is the upward trend a function of cheap central-bank money? Is a bull-cycle of roughly 7-years the fruit of higher productivity or a result of central-banks unwillingness to raise interest-rates? Is it the nature of development that tech assets and internet companies have higher valuations than those firms that produce stuff an employ people?

For sure, all these question marks have always been there. And they will always be. But keep in mind that in the cycle before the 2007-09 crisis, a similar discussion took place. Low interest rates that remained for an overly long period of time; cheap money created and circulated by central banks; and the built-up of capital in asset classes that turned out to not to be the ones that mattered – these were all features of the 2000s bull-cycle.

Back then, no person of sane mind would question the pace of globalization. No one would dare putting a question mark behind housing. Not even the craziest would contest the financial engineers’ ability to build products. Even the diehard atheists were convinced of the god-likeliness of the Chairman (of the Fed, that is).

Today, many of the same question marks remain but can be applied to different trends, sectors and skills. The trouble is twofold. First, there is too much capital in the system. The more capital there is and the more this capital deviates from the natural investment stock, the harder is the landing. Once market-agents realize that they were valuating a capital stock much higher than the real demand for that stock is, its value implodes – crisis. Second, the more this capital-stock deviates from the natural preference for capital or assets, the longer it takes to correct this misallocation – long crisis.

Granted: The “natural” investment stock and the “natural” preference for assets seem difficult to find out. But “natural” means nothing more than what market agents would do if there weren’t interventions from central bankers pouring money into the system and lowering interest-rates. “Natural” is only what agents would do if they were to choose freely, invest per their own risk-budgets and with their own money. All of these three are currently hindered by monetary policies.

Truisms and banalities? Of course. When investors use their own money, act per their individual risk-budges and choose freely, the risk of financial crises is considerably lower. Even if they hit, markets can shake off the effects of by themselves quickly. However, the next crisis is born when central banks meddle either by keeping interest rates low or by creating too much capital. Both of them being done right now.

Henrique Schneider is the chief economist of the Swiss Federation of Small and Medium Enterprises and board member in different funds and asset managers.

New Books
Mehr als Helden: Menschen; Portrait überraschender Liberaler
https://tinyurl.com/yceyvhpr

Uber: Innovation in Society
https://tinyurl.com/ycljdjwb

Creative Destruction and the Sharing Economy
https://tinyurl.com/y7apcebg

Indifferenz, Gegnerschaft, Identität: Veränderungen im politischen Verhältnis von Dorf und Staat im Kosovo
https://tinyurl.com/y8yzhlhd

Copyright © 2017 Henri Schneider - All Rights Reserved Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.


© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in