Canada-China Trade Amid NAFTA Friction
Politics / Protectionism Dec 04, 2017 - 06:13 AM GMTBy: Dan_Steinbock
	 
	
   As tensions prevail in the NAFTA talks, Canada is  hedging its bets by fostering consensus for a trade agreement with China.
As tensions prevail in the NAFTA talks, Canada is  hedging its bets by fostering consensus for a trade agreement with China.
  On Sunday, Canadian  Prime Minister Justin Trudeau shall start a trade and tourism dialogue with  Chinese officials during his ongoing visit to China. Canada and China began to  talk about a free trade agreement (FTA) more than a year ago, following  back-to-back meetings of Trudeau and Chinese Premier Li Keqiang in China and Ottawa. 
 
While Canada completed consultations on the matter, three rounds of exploratory talks were held between the two sides from February to August.
Trudeau’s visit takes place after the fifth round of talks over the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) ended in Mexico City amid simmering tensions.
Hedging against the potential NAFTA collapse
  Last year, the US bought  three-fourths of Canadian exports, while Canada sourced almost two-thirds of  its imports from America. US direct investment in Canada amounts to some $306  billion, while Canada’s investment in the US is almost $370 billion. But the US  investment in Canada represents almost 20 percent of the latter’s GDP; while  Canada’s investment in the US adds up to only 2 percent of the US’s GDP. The  outcome of the NAFTA talks is thus far more important to Canada than to the US.
  If the US withdraws  from NAFTA, that would start a six-month legal process before official  termination. While the Trump administration may see this as a negotiating tool  to force Canada and Mexico to accept its demands, the latter could use the time  to complete trade talks with Brazil and the European Union (EU). 
  Canada and Mexico are  hedging their bets against a potential NAFTA collapse by pushing for deals with  new partners, particularly with China and some other Asian countries.
  In 2015, China bought  12 percent of Canadian exports, whereas Chinese exports accounted of 4 percent  of Canadian total. A Chinese-Canadian FTA could strengthen bilateral trade and  investment significantly.
  Last year, the combined  investment from China and Hong Kong in Canada soared to $26.4 billion, which is  almost half of Asia Pacific investment in the country. But since the  starting-point is low, China was only the eighth largest investor in Canada.
  Canada’s former China  ambassador Howard Balloch believes that Canada “should be able to negotiate  with China” during the NAFTA talks. Canada has a “huge interest” in China and  trade diversification whatever the outcome of the NAFTA talks. 
Intriguingly, the  latter are likely to coincide with the time that Canada and China would need to  finalize an FTA agreement.  
Political divisions, domestic support
  With a population of  more than 1.3 billion, China is perceived as a lucrative market for Canada's  agriculture and natural resources sectors. Last year, Trudeau's cabinet approved  the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion mainly to improve Canada's ability to get  oil to China.
  However, there is an  intense debate over the proposed FTA with China. While Trudeau’s Liberal Party  supports greater bilateral trade, Conservative leader Andrew Scheer opposes a  bilateral FTA. Relying on the “China threat” card, Conservatives have  criticized the Liberals for allowing Chinese takeovers of Canadian businesses, while  taking advantage of Canadian concerns about human rights and environmental  standards. 
  What about ordinary  Canadians? Asia Pacific Foundation’s polling suggests that a slight majority of  55 percent might support a Canadian-Chinese FTA, but UBC’s recent poll indicates  that 70 percent of Canadians support the idea and only 20 percent are against  it. 
Such a shift would  reflect greater economic interest in a bilateral trade deal – but also growing  concern about the Trump White House, rising US protectionism and the potential  NAFTA collapse.
Canada’s shift toward Asia
  While US officials have  sought to subdue NAFTA tensions by extending the timetable for renegotiations  that may only pour oil on the simmering fire. In Mexico, tight elections in  mid-2018 will complicate the NAFTA talks; in Canada, conservatives are  positioning for the 2019 elections. 
  Nevertheless, Canada is  losing its faith in the US. According to UBC, 36 percent of Canadians believe  the US is a “more responsible global leader” than China (28%). Yet, 37 percent  of the citizens are “uncertain” about the matter. Moreover, China is seen as  doing more to “maintain peace” than the US and two-thirds of Canadians believe  China will be the “largest economic power” by the 2020s.
  Amid the new  uncertainty, Canada is likely to do what it can to sustain NAFTA over time,  while – at least under Trudeau – it is likely to seek a trade deal with China  that would foster diversification, new investment at home and greater presence  in Asia.
  From China’s  standpoint, a bilateral deal with Canada would open new doors to North America  and pave way to the Free Trade Agreement of Asia Pacific (FTAAP), which would  be broader and more inclusive than the current trade pact efforts.
The author is the founder of Difference Group and has served as research director at the India, China and America Institute (USA) and visiting fellow at the Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (China) and the EU Center (Singapore).
Dr Steinbock is the founder of the Difference Group and has served as the research director at the India, China, and America Institute (USA) and a visiting fellow at the Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (China) and the EU Center (Singapore). For more information, see http://www.differencegroup.net/
© 2017 Copyright Dan Steinbock - All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.
© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.
	

 
  
