Most Popular

United States About to be Hit by Hyper-Inflationary Hurricane!

Economics / HyperInflation Nov 03, 2008 - 12:24 PM GMT

By: Adrian_Ash

"...Prolonged inflation (and, especially hyperinflation) cannot continue without increases in the monetary base..."

"A COUNTRY'S LONG-RUN INFLATION is caused primarily, or perhaps exclusively, by increases in its own monetary base," wrote Richard G.Anderson – a vice-president and senior economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of St.Louis – in a 2006 paper.

Which would mean America is about to get hit by a hurricane of money-blown inflation in the cost of living.

Base money, the economists tell us, means cash – notes and coins only – held outside of the central bank and outside government.

It doesn't include any measure of credit, debt or near-money items (such as commercial bonds or letters of credit). The monetary base is simply the sum total of notes and coins available in the economy. That's why it's also known as "high-powered money"...the source of what then becomes credit, debt and near-money promises when it's lent, re-lent and re-lent again by the banks.

As you can see, the steady growth in the US monetary base – averaging 6% per year since the end of the First World War – just morphed into an unprecedented jump. The quantity of base money in the US economy – meaning the actual volume of Uncle Sam's official cash notes and coins held in private hands – swelled by 25% during October.

And what does that mean?

"Prolonged inflation (and, especially hyperinflation) cannot continue without increases in the monetary base," continued Dr. Anderson – who's made something of a specialism of studying base money – in that 2006 research paper. Whereas "sharp reductions in inflation such as occurred in the United States during 1979-1980 typically are accompanied by, and likely require, sharp reductions in the monetary base."

There seems little chance, however, of a "sharp reduction" in the amount of money flowing round America right now. Not with the Federal Reserve itself pumping credit into America's banks, brokers and dealers.

US banks owed, on average, less than $600 million to the Federal Reserve between 1986 and the start of 2008. Their outstanding debt to the US central bank hit a record high of $12 billion just after the 9/11 attacks of 2001.

By the middle of last month, that outstanding debt stood above $400 billion, thanks to two developments:

#1. Starting in March '08, the Fed's data included not only the borrowings by depository banks, but also primary dealers, broker-dealers, and then – from Sept. – also investment funds holding asset-backed commercial paper (debt raised by the banks from the money markets) and other credit extensions to financial institutions;

#2. The fact the Fed has actually started extending all these new loans to all these new types of borrowers, rather than just making short-term loans to deposit-taking banks.

Please Note: The Fed's new and fast-growing loans to the money markets – the "Term auction credit" – doesn't show in the Fed debt figures charted above. So that's another $750 billion you can add to the pile for the Oct.-to-Dec. period.

The upshot? "I am worried about the deflation risk," says Stephen King, head economist at HSBC bank in London. "Deflation and stag-deflation will, in six months, become the main concern of policy authorities," agrees Nouriel Roubini, the media's credit-crunch darling, from the Stern Business School in New York.

All in all, "if inflation expectations were to decline sharply," says Frederic Mishkin – a former Fed policy maker and now a professor at Columbia University – "that would greatly increase the risk of deflation."

Confused? You should be. Deflation as properly defined means a shrinking money supply. Inflation is its opposite. The one tends to create falling prices (and thus encourage bankruptcy and job losses) while the other is always and everywhere followed by a rise in the cost of living (but without stronger business necessarily hiring new staff).

So place your bets now. Because whether you're a gambler or not, the Fed's massive monetary inflation – both in loans to banks and brokers, as well as in notes and coins – is going to force your hand.

By Adrian Ash
BullionVault.com

Gold price chart, no delay | Free Report: 5 Myths of the Gold Market
City correspondent for The Daily Reckoning in London and a regular contributor to MoneyWeek magazine, Adrian Ash is the editor of Gold News and head of research at www.BullionVault.com , giving you direct access to investment gold, vaulted in Zurich , on $3 spreads and 0.8% dealing fees.

(c) BullionVault 2008

Please Note: This article is to inform your thinking, not lead it. Only you can decide the best place for your money, and any decision you make will put your money at risk. Information or data included here may have already been overtaken by events – and must be verified elsewhere – should you choose to act on it.

© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.

Comments

Walt Thiessen 07 Nov 08, 08:12

out of context quote Your quote from Richard Anderson is out of context and misconstrues what he actually wrote. The full quote is: "To the extent that inflation is driven by total aggregate demand, foreign currency used in transactions matters. To the extent, however, that a country’s long-run inflation largely is caused primarily, or perhaps exclusively, by increases in its own monetary base, foreign currency is properly excluded. Current empirical studies provide little guidance as to which is the more appropriate measure in these cases." Your quote makes it sound like he's giving a definitive thumbs up to the idea that increases in the monetary base is what causes inflation, but clearly the larger quote is nowhere near as definitive. I second the motion that there is a direct link between monetary supply and inflation, but misquoting Fed officials in order to promote that idea is counter-productive, in my opinion.