Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. Investing in a Bubble Mania Stock Market Trending Towards Financial Crisis 2.0 CRASH! - 9th Sep 21
2.Tech Stocks Bubble Valuations 2000 vs 2021 - 25th Sep 21
3.Stock Market FOMO Going into Crash Season - 8th Oct 21
4.Stock Market FOMO Hits September Brick Wall - Evergrande China's Lehman's Moment - 22nd Sep 21
5.Crypto Bubble BURSTS! BTC, ETH, XRP CRASH! NiceHash Seizes Funds on Account Halting ALL Withdrawals! - 19th May 21
6.How to Protect Your Self From a Stock Market CRASH / Bear Market? - 14th Oct 21
7.AI Stocks Portfolio Buying and Selling Levels Going Into Market Correction - 11th Oct 21
8.Why Silver Price Could Crash by 20%! - 5th Oct 21
9.Powell: Inflation Might Not Be Transitory, After All - 3rd Oct 21
10.Global Stock Markets Topped 60 Days Before the US Stocks Peaked - 23rd Sep 21
Last 7 days
AI Tech Stocks State Going into the CRASH and Capitalising on the Metaverse - 25th Jan 22
Stock Market Relief Rally, Maybe? - 25th Jan 22
Why Gold’s Latest Rally Is Nothing to Get Excited About - 25th Jan 22
Gold Slides and Rebounds in 2022 - 25th Jan 22
Gold; a stellar picture - 25th Jan 22
CATHY WOOD ARK GARBAGE ARK Funds Heading for 90% STOCK CRASH! - 22nd Jan 22
Gold Is the Belle of the Ball. Will Its Dance Turn Bearish? - 22nd Jan 22
Best Neighborhoods to Buy Real Estate in San Diego - 22nd Jan 22
Stock Market January PANIC AI Tech Stocks Buying Opp - Trend Forecast 2022 - 21st Jan 21
How to Get Rich in the MetaVerse - 20th Jan 21
Should you Buy Payment Disruptor Stocks in 2022? - 20th Jan 21
2022 the Year of Smart devices, Electric Vehicles, and AI Startups - 20th Jan 21
Oil Markets More Animated by Geopolitics, Supply, and Demand - 20th Jan 21
Fake It Till You Make It: Will Silver’s Motto Work on Gold? - 19th Jan 22
Crude Oil Smashing Stocks - 19th Jan 22
US Stagflation: The Global Risk of 2022 - 19th Jan 22
Stock Market Trend Forecast Early 2022 - Tech Growth Value Stocks Rotation - 18th Jan 22
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: Are We Setting Up For A 'Mini-Crash'? - 18th Jan 22
Mobile Sports Betting is on a rise: Here’s why - 18th Jan 22
Exponential AI Stocks Mega-trend - 17th Jan 22
THE NEXT BITCOIN - 17th Jan 22
Gold Price Predictions for 2022 - 17th Jan 22
How Do Debt Relief Services Work To Reduce The Amount You Owe? - 17th Jan 22
RIVIAN IPO Illustrates We are in the Mother of all Stock Market Bubbles - 16th Jan 22
All Market Eyes on Copper - 16th Jan 22
The US Dollar Had a Slip-Up, but Gold Turned a Blind Eye to It - 16th Jan 22
A Stock Market Top for the Ages - 16th Jan 22
FREETRADE - Stock Investing Platform, the Good, Bad and Ugly Review, Free Shares, Cancelled Orders - 15th Jan 22
WD 14tb My Book External Drive Unboxing, Testing and Benchmark Performance Amazon Buy Review - 15th Jan 22
Toyland Ferris Wheel Birthday Fun at Gulliver's Rother Valley UK Theme Park 2022 - 15th Jan 22
What You Should Know About a TailoredPay High Risk Merchant Account - 15th Jan 22
Best Metaverse Tech Stocks Investing for 2022 and Beyond - 14th Jan 22
Gold Price Lagging Inflation - 14th Jan 22
Get Your Startup Idea Up And Running With These 7 Tips - 14th Jan 22
What Happens When Your Flight Gets Cancelled in the UK? - 14th Jan 22

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

Why Adding Bureaucracy Won't Halt the Housing Market Blues

Housing-Market / US Housing Jan 06, 2010 - 05:42 AM GMT

By: Money_Morning


Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleMartin Hutchinson writes: U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke's latest thesis is that the home mortgage bubble had little to do with record low interest rates, and was actually much more a problem of regulation.

It sounds plausible - until you give it some real thought. After all, I believe that humanity has already tried a system with tight, vigorously enforced regulations, and no price mechanism.

It was called the Soviet Union.

Okay, that was a bit of a cheap shot - to some extent. Bernanke stated that "borrowers chose and were extended mortgages that they could not be expected to service over the longer term." That appears to make the problem one of regulation: The types of mortgages that banks should be permitted to offer should be limited to ones that borrowers have a reasonable chance of servicing.

In theory this makes sense. However, it is a prime example of what I in the past have referred to as the "Keynesian Bureaucrat Fallacy," or KBF.

Under the KBF, wise bureaucrats - who, like economist John Maynard Keynes, were presumably educated at Cambridge and steeped in the traditions of the Bloomsbury Group - will decide the appropriate regulations for every sphere of the economy.

They will then enforce them with draconian rigor, forcing the economy to behave in a way that optimizes economic welfare, measured by whatever means the bureaucrats devise. Irrational market-based signals - such as the price mechanism, will be ignored - unless the bureaucrats decide it is safe to take account of them.

Keynes would claim that the Soviet Union never tried his theories. Technically, he was correct. In that unhappy society, there was far too much corruption, far too much vodka, far too much cruelty and not nearly enough wisdom for Keynes and his Bloomsbury Group soul mates ever to find it truly congenial. After all, Keynes' wife - the ballerina Lydia Lopokova - was herself a refugee from the Soviet "paradise."

Nevertheless, the problem lay not in the Soviets' flawed implementation of Keynes' dirigiste fantasies, but in the theory itself. As such post-Keynes "public choice" economists as Nobelist James M. Buchanan have discovered, you simply can't get good enough bureaucrats for the Keynesian system to work.

In real life, the bureaucrats themselves have objectives of power, control and ideology that prevent them from imposing the wise regulations that Keynes would prefer. Government bureaucracies aren't all-knowing umpires of the economic market. In fact, the bureaucracies are actually participants in that market. And they are as driven by their own private objectives as any businessman or trader. Corruption is just the most obvious of the myriad problems that occur in practice.

Once you accept this reality, the theory falls down.

Writing regulations governing what kind of home mortgages people are allowed is thus impossible, without defining the product so narrowly you restrict necessary choice. In general, in any kind of free market, you have to rely on the rationality of both parties to the transaction. Banks will normally only write home mortgage loans if they think they will get repaid. And borrowers will only take them out if they think the house they are buying is fairly priced and they are confident of being able to service the debt. Provided the market is not irrationally exuberant or irrationally fearful, dodgy home mortgages will be only a minor problem.

However, we do know that interest rates and money supply have a huge effect on the housing market. And we knew this before 2002, despite what Bernanke and Fed-chairman predecessor Alan Greenspan would have us believe.

Allowing rates to get too low and money to slosh all over the place may not cause inflation - if, at the same time, China is manufacturing up a storm and lowering costs in other parts of the economy. But the artificially low rates will certainly raise what Keynes liked to call the "animal spirits" of borrowers and lenders.

And that will cause those borrowers to behave irrationally.

Borrowers will take out silly mortgages because they think house prices will rise and bail them out. And brokers will see the chance of quick commissions - even if the loans are not repaid - because rising house prices will make the loans good.

I understand Bernanke's wish to absolve himself of blame. But his preference for putting in more regulations over allowing the price mechanism of interest rates to work in the housing market didn't work when Gosplan (Russia's central economic planning commission) tried it, and it won't work now.

Now more than ever, it's obvious we need a new Fed chairman. Let's hope the U.S. Senate in a couple of weeks does its duty to the U.S. economy and votes Bernanke down.

[ Editor's Note : Some experts have labeled the U.S. bailout as "Bernanke's Folly" - and with reason: With all the debt the United States has taken on, the country is facing a financial mess that will take years to fix. But investors who are willing to act boldly and invest decisively will find an unparalleled profit opportunity hidden behind the piles of financial refuse.

With his Permanent Wealth Investor trading service, longtime global investment banker Martin Hutchinson has time and again demonstrated the ability to ferret out those profit moves. With a combination of gold, hefty dividend payers and stocks that are ready to rocket, Hutchinson has already secured windfalls for subscribers. To find out about Hutchinson's latest moves, please click here.]


Money Morning/The Money Map Report

©2009 Monument Street Publishing. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), of content from this website, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Monument Street Publishing. 105 West Monument Street, Baltimore MD 21201, Email:

Disclaimer: Nothing published by Money Morning should be considered personalized investment advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investment advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security recommended to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication, or 72 hours after the mailing of printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended by Money Morning should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Money Morning Archive

© 2005-2019 - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.

Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in