Most Popular
1. Banking Crisis is Stocks Bull Market Buying Opportunity - Nadeem_Walayat
2.The Crypto Signal for the Precious Metals Market - P_Radomski_CFA
3. One Possible Outcome to a New World Order - Raymond_Matison
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
5. Apple AAPL Stock Trend and Earnings Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
6.AI, Stocks, and Gold Stocks – Connected After All - P_Radomski_CFA
7.Stock Market CHEAT SHEET - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.US Debt Ceiling Crisis Smoke and Mirrors Circus - Nadeem_Walayat
9.Silver Price May Explode - Avi_Gilburt
10.More US Banks Could Collapse -- A Lot More- EWI
Last 7 days
Stock Market Volatility (VIX) - 25th Mar 24
Stock Market Investor Sentiment - 25th Mar 24
The Federal Reserve Didn't Do Anything But It Had Plenty to Say - 25th Mar 24
Stock Market Breadth - 24th Mar 24
Stock Market Margin Debt Indicator - 24th Mar 24
It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - 24th Mar 24
Stocks: What to Make of All This Insider Selling- 24th Mar 24
Money Supply Continues To Fall, Economy Worsens – Investors Don’t Care - 24th Mar 24
Get an Edge in the Crypto Market with Order Flow - 24th Mar 24
US Presidential Election Cycle and Recessions - 18th Mar 24
US Recession Already Happened in 2022! - 18th Mar 24
AI can now remember everything you say - 18th Mar 24
Bitcoin Crypto Mania 2024 - MicroStrategy MSTR Blow off Top! - 14th Mar 24
Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - 11th Mar 24
Gold and the Long-Term Inflation Cycle - 11th Mar 24
Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - 11th Mar 24
Two Reasons The Fed Manipulates Interest Rates - 11th Mar 24
US Dollar Trend 2024 - 9th Mar 2024
The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - 9th Mar 2024
Investors Don’t Believe the Gold Rally, Still Prefer General Stocks - 9th Mar 2024
Paper Gold Vs. Real Gold: It's Important to Know the Difference - 9th Mar 2024
Stocks: What This "Record Extreme" Indicator May Be Signaling - 9th Mar 2024
My 3 Favorite Trade Setups - Elliott Wave Course - 9th Mar 2024
Bitcoin Crypto Bubble Mania! - 4th Mar 2024
US Interest Rates - When WIll the Fed Pivot - 1st Mar 2024
S&P Stock Market Real Earnings Yield - 29th Feb 2024
US Unemployment is a Fake Statistic - 29th Feb 2024
U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - 29th Feb 2024
What a Breakdown in Silver Mining Stocks! What an Opportunity! - 29th Feb 2024
Why AI will Soon become SA - Synthetic Intelligence - The Machine Learning Megatrend - 29th Feb 2024
Keep Calm and Carry on Buying Quantum AI Tech Stocks - 19th Feb 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

BHP Billiton Enhanced Bid for Rio Tinto

Companies / Metals & Mining Feb 08, 2008 - 03:41 AM GMT

By: Fat_Prophets

Companies

Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleBHP Billiton has enhanced its previous 3-for-1 scrip offer for Rio Tinto, by announcing on the final day before the 'put up of shut up' deadline, a fresh 3.4-for-1 scrip offer. What role the late entry of the Chinese-Alcoa alliance into proceedings had on BHP increasing its offer remains to be seen, but it would seem to have forced BHP's hand to some degree. BHP has also announced a US$6.0 billion interim result for the six months to 31 December 2007, which was broadly in line with market expectations.

"The motive for BHP remains clear - acquisition of Rio Tinto would create a mining company with unparalleled market and pricing influence."


Fat Prophets initially recommended buying BHP at $25.84 in January 2006 (Fat Mining 10). Our last review of this stock was during November (Fat Mining 102).

From a charting perspective, the longer-term outlook for BHP remains buoyant. As evident on the weekly chart, despite an increase in volatility over the past six months, the longer-term upward trend remains intact.

In the shorter-term, price movements are related closely to events surrounding the takeover bid for Rio Tinto. Although prices have eased back from the rebound high of $40.30, we believe that underlying investor support remains firm with support in the region of $35.65 to $34.55 to limit downside risks. Below here, the $31 low of January underpins the broader upward trend.

Once the current volatility subsides, we anticipate a period of consolidation in order to build a base to support future gains. In time, we believe that potential remains for a continuation of the long-term underlying upward trend.

BHP Billiton has tabled a fresh offer for Rio Tinto as it attempts to boost market support for its ambition to create the world's biggest mining group. Its bid is conditional upon gaining more than 50% of acceptances.

Hot on the heels of the entry of the Chinese-Alcoa alliance on the scene with their raid on the Rio Tinto share register last Friday in London, BHP has announced an enhanced 3.4-for-1 scrip offer for RIO just a day before the 'put up or shut up' deadline.

This effectively values RIO shares at A$156.74 per share, which is a premium to their closing price of $127.35 a share on Tuesday, prior to the announcement of the revised bid. This of course will change with the pullback in BHP's share price on the market on Wednesday.

Do we think at this initial stage that the new offer will be successful? Well, it's not going to be easy in our view, although it obviously stands a greater chance than the previous offer that was described as 'dead in the water', by the RIO board. We still believe a bid of around 4-for-1 will be needed to sway RIO holders. A lot will depend on the actions of the Chinese.

A consortium comprising Aluminium Corp of China (Chinalco) (backed by the Chinese government) and Alcoa of the US stunned the market late last week with a £7.2 billion swoop on Rio Tinto, that gave the consortium a 9% stake in the company, and a major say in what happens next.

The consortium says they do not plan to bid for the rest of RIO and interestingly also say that the price paid 'reflects fair value for RIO.' This was a view that Chinalco president, Xioa Yaqing, reiterated at a press conference in Sydney, to explain the deal on Monday afternoon.

Their purchase price represents around a 4-for-1 valuation with respect to BHP-RIO, so on the surface it would initially seem as though they would be hesitant to let their investment go on a 3.4-for-1 basis, if they were to sell into BHP's scrip offer.

It is clear to us that the Chinese are not interested in gaining control of RIO. This would be met with stringent opposition by the Australian federal government on national interest grounds, as the Chinese would be aware. The Australian government would seek to preserve resources of substantial national economic interest, principally the Pilbara iron ore assets in Western Australia.

The deal so far is a small price for the Chinese and Alcoa to pay to gain at the table in any future discussions with BHP and potentially get a share of the spoils resulting from the sell-off of chunks of the merged group's aluminium/alumina assets. Remember, one of the jewels in RIO's crown is the Alcan aluminium business, which it successfully acquired late last year, beating Alcoa in a takeover battle. Both Chinalco and Alcoa would be keen to share the spoils in any asset sell-off. The decision to strengthen its links with Chinalco was the simplest option for Alcoa after the failure of the Alcan bid. Bear in mind also that Chinalco and Alcoa have reserved their right to increase their stake, but only if BHP makes a formal bid or cuts a deal with Rio, which it has dome.

So the Chinese could look to raise the stakes from here. BHP's revised 3.4-for-1 share offer represents a 45% premium to Rio's pre-bid price in November last year and that the portions that each company would hold in a merged group would be BHP 56% and RIO 44%. As we have previously indicated, there are numerous compelling reasons as to why a getting together of the two groups makes sense. If a deal can be agreed, it would be close to the biggest takeover in history and would be worth between US$350 and US$400 billion.

The merged company would have estimated annual revenues of more than $US55 billion and estimated earnings of close to $US30 billion a year. The purchase of Rio would create a company that controls more than a third of the iron-ore market, supplies the most energy coal and copper, 25% of the world's uranium, and which owns mines and oilfields in six continents. In preparing its proposal, BHP Billiton says it has examined in detail the regulatory issues and other practicalities of a merger. But the deal has to run significant hurdles: firstly the Rio board will have to be convinced, secondly its shareholders will have to be convinced, and thirdly a range of regulatory approvals will be needed.

One of the major benefits of a merger in our view (although BHP denies this is a motivation) is greater market and price control. BHP in a very politically correct way says the bid is all about economies of scale, infrastructure sharing and removing duplication. This is what it has to say to avoid putting regulators and customers offside!

The reality however is that in our minds BHP would love to have a situation where it can be the dominant player, a one-stop shop if you like, in commodity markets across the globe.

Iron ore is a perfect example of a commodity where industry consolidation and market dominance by a handful of key players can generate a surge in earnings. Iron ore prices, which were previously in the doldrums, have rebounded to the point where prices will have risen for six consecutive years, to record levels.

The emergence of China is only a partial explanation. The control of supply is the major factor here. The concentration of 80% of the iron ore market into the hands of three key players (CVRD, RIO and BHP) means iron ore producers now have solidarity at price negotiations and unprecedented bargaining power.

BHP would love to try and duplicate this level of influence across the commodity spectrum.

A successful bid for RIO was never going to be easy to pull off. A company with high quality assets like Rio does not come along every day and with the furious takeover activity in the resources sector over recent years, the cupboard is getting increasingly bare.

BHP plans to complete any deal through two schemes of arrangement: one in Australia and one in the UK. This is because BHP currently has the majority of its shares listed in Australia, whilst but Rio has more of its capital in the UK. The combined group would have a similar amount of shares listed in Australia and London.

BHP says it has will put $US30 billion toward a share buyback to placate investors hoping for a cash component to the bid.

BHP said it expected the takeover would lead to $US3.7 billion of pre-tax cost savings by 2013, which is a fair time to wait. Around $US1.7 billion would come from cost savings achieved by removing duplication, and the remaining $US2 billion would be driven by the acceleration of volumes to customers.

BHP cited potential savings achievable by combining the pair's iron ore operations in Western Australia and coalmines in the Hunter Valley and Queensland's Bowen Basin. These are obvious examples.

From a broader perspective the bid is also highly significant. In our view it reflects enormous confidence in the sustainability of the current mining boom and the fact that it has a long way to run yet. We have firmly maintained our view that this is a decades-long situation unfolding and that we are still only in the early stages.

We nevertheless remain cautious about mega-mergers in the resource sector and the economy generally. Very few in recent have at the end of the day created value for shareholders. Good examples can be seen at the big end of the gold and oil sectors, where mega-mergers have created companies that are struggling to maintain output, boost profits and replenish declining reserves. These companies have effectively become 'too big' in our view.

BHP will have to ensure that it firstly doesn't overpay for Rio Tinto and secondly that it does not end up in a similar dead-end to the big players in the gold and oil sectors, which have hit a brick wall in terms of growth options.

Finally, a quick comment on BHP's earnings, which have been overshadowed by events surrounding its RIO bid.

BHP says the outlook for commodity prices remains strong after delivering a minor dip in first-half profit. The miner has reported interim earnings of $US6.017 billion, 2.4% lower than the previous corresponding period, but in line with market estimates.

BHP delivered record or equal-record production for seven major commodities, resulting in record half-year earnings for the group's iron ore, petroleum and manganese divisions. Revenue for the half increased by 15.5% to $US22.539 billion, with underlying EBIT coming in at $US9.623 billion.

Increased prices and sales volumes pushed underlying earnings for the company's iron ore division up 19.2% higher to $US1.673 billion. High oil prices helped to drive earnings in the petroleum division 22.3% higher to $US1.972 billion, while the manganese group reported a 310.5% increase in earnings to $US431 million.

BHP has also announced its interim dividend will be increased by 45% to US29 cents per share.

BHP Billiton said in the medium term that the demand growth for its major commodities would remain robust, with bulk commodity contract prices and oil and thermal coal prices should remain strong. The company expects the industrialisation of China to drive strong demand growth in the longer-term.

However, BHP also said the pace of global economic growth had moderated as a result of a worldwide credit crisis, despite robust growth in many major economies. BHP Billiton expects the global economy to slow in the short-term as developed economies experience a moderation in their economic activity.

We will watch developments with great interest as they unfold with respect to RIO. In the meantime, BHP Billiton will remain firmly held within the Fat Prophets Mining & Resources portfolio.

For a FREE sample of Fat Prophets research please call 02079369357 or email peter.lomas@fatprophets.co.uk.

About Us - Fat Prophets provides independent advice on the financial markets where our objective is to be transparent, accountable, objective and ethical. We believe that integrity is the central characteristic of every successful investor. Our independence in financial markets is derived from the fact that Fat Prophets does not execute transactions or provide investment banking services.

Fat Prophets principal focus is to deliver a quality service to Members by discovering and identifying quality stock recommendations on the London Stock Exchange. The launch of our UK service follows the successful establishment of Fat Prophets in Australasia.

Founded in June 2000, Fat Prophets is owned and operated by financial markets professionals. Having become Australia's leading independent stock market advisors, our horizons were broadened during 2003 through the addition of Fat Prophets United Kingdom. Our service offering also includes Fat Prophets Mining & Resources, Fat Prophets USA, and Fat Prophets Funds Management.

Fat Prophets UK was launched in 2003. As one of the world's largest stock markets, the UK offers an expansive array of investment opportunities. Within this environment our value-based strategy has proven highly successful, and fattened our Members' portfolios.

Fat Prophets Australasia focuses on delivering a quality service to Members by identifying and recommending undervalued companies on the Australian and New Zealand stock exchanges.

Fat Prophets Mining & Resources coverage extends to companies involved in mining, exploration, precious metals, diversified resources, energy, mineral sands, bulk ores, diamonds, as well as mining and energy infrastructure services.

Fat Prophets USA has an international focus, recommending a broad range of US based and foreign companies trading on the US exchanges.

Fat Prophets Funds Management In 2005 the company diversified into funds management when the Fat Prophets Australia Share Fund (Fat Fund) was successfully listed on the Australian Stock Exchange after $33 million was raised.

Disclaimer : Mint Financial (UK) Ltd, trading as Fat Prophets United Kingdom, has made every effort to ensure the reliability of the views and recommendations expressed in this report. Fat Prophets United Kingdom research is based upon information known to us or which was obtained from sources which we believed to be reliable and accurate at time of publication. However, like the markets, we are not perfect.
This report is prepared for general information only, and as such, the specific needs, investment objectives or financial situation of any particular user have not been taken into consideration. Individuals should therefore discuss, with their financial planner or advisor, the merits of each recommendation for their own specific circumstances and realise that not all investments will be appropriate for all subscribers.
To the extent permitted by law, Fat Prophets United Kingdom and its employees, agents and authorised representatives exclude all liability for any loss or damage (including indirect, special or consequential loss or damage) arising from the use of, or reliance on, any information within the report whether or not caused by any negligent act or omission. If the law prohibits the exclusion of such liability, Fat Prophets United Kingdom hereby limits its liability, to the extent permitted by law, to the resupply of the said information or the cost of the said resupply.

Fat Prophets Archive

© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in