Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. Investing in a Bubble Mania Stock Market Trending Towards Financial Crisis 2.0 CRASH! - 9th Sep 21
2.Tech Stocks Bubble Valuations 2000 vs 2021 - 25th Sep 21
3.Stock Market FOMO Going into Crash Season - 8th Oct 21
4.Stock Market FOMO Hits September Brick Wall - Evergrande China's Lehman's Moment - 22nd Sep 21
5.Crypto Bubble BURSTS! BTC, ETH, XRP CRASH! NiceHash Seizes Funds on Account Halting ALL Withdrawals! - 19th May 21
6.How to Protect Your Self From a Stock Market CRASH / Bear Market? - 14th Oct 21
7.AI Stocks Portfolio Buying and Selling Levels Going Into Market Correction - 11th Oct 21
8.Why Silver Price Could Crash by 20%! - 5th Oct 21
9.Powell: Inflation Might Not Be Transitory, After All - 3rd Oct 21
10.Global Stock Markets Topped 60 Days Before the US Stocks Peaked - 23rd Sep 21
Last 7 days
RIVIAN IPO Illustrates We are in the Mother of all Stock Market Bubbles - 16th Jan 22
All Market Eyes on Copper - 16th Jan 22
The US Dollar Had a Slip-Up, but Gold Turned a Blind Eye to It - 16th Jan 22
A Stock Market Top for the Ages - 16th Jan 22
FREETRADE - Stock Investing Platform, the Good, Bad and Ugly Review, Free Shares, Cancelled Orders - 15th Jan 22
WD 14tb My Book External Drive Unboxing, Testing and Benchmark Performance Amazon Buy Review - 15th Jan 22
Toyland Ferris Wheel Birthday Fun at Gulliver's Rother Valley UK Theme Park 2022 - 15th Jan 22
What You Should Know About a TailoredPay High Risk Merchant Account - 15th Jan 22
Best Metaverse Tech Stocks Investing for 2022 and Beyond - 14th Jan 22
Gold Price Lagging Inflation - 14th Jan 22
Get Your Startup Idea Up And Running With These 7 Tips - 14th Jan 22
What Happens When Your Flight Gets Cancelled in the UK? - 14th Jan 22
How to Profit from 2022’s Biggest Trend Reversal - 11th Jan 22
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: Are We Ready To Drop To 4400SPX? - 11th Jan 22
What's the Role of an Affiliate Marketer? - 11th Jan 22
Essential Things To Know Before You Set Up A Limited Liability Company - 11th Jan 22
NVIDIA THE KING OF THE METAVERSE! - 10th Jan 22
Fiscal and Monetary Cliffs Have Arrived - 10th Jan 22
The Meteoric Rise of Investing in Trading Cards - 10th Jan 22
IBM The REAL Quantum Metaverse STOCK! - 9th Jan 22
WARNING Failing NVME2 M2 SSD Drives Can Prevent Systems From Booting - Corsair MP600 - 9th Jan 22
The Fed’s inflated cake and a ‘quant’ of history - 9th Jan 22
NVME M2 SSD FAILURE WARNING Signs - Corsair MP600 1tb Drive - 9th Jan 22
Meadowhall Sheffield Christmas Lights 2021 Shopping - Before the Switch on - 9th Jan 22
How Does Insurance Work In Europe? Find Out Here - 9th Jan 22
MATTERPORT (MTTR) - DIGITIZING THE REAL WORLD - METAVERSE INVESTING 2022 - 7th Jan 22
Effect of Deflation On The Gold Price - 7th Jan 22
Stock Market 2022 Requires Different Strategies For Traders/Investors - 7th Jan 22
Old Man Winter Will Stimulate Natural Gas and Heating Oil Demand - 7th Jan 22
Is The Lazy Stock Market Bull Strategy Worth Considering? - 7th Jan 22
METAVERSE - NEW LIFE FOR SONY AGEING GAMING GIANT? - 6th Jan 2022
What Elliott Waves Show for Asia Pacific Stock and Financial Markets 2022 - 6th Jan 2022
Why You Should Register Your Company - 6th Jan 2022
4 Ways to Invest in Silver for 2022 - 6th Jan 2022
UNITY (U) - Metaverse Stock Analysis Investing for 2022 and Beyond - 5th Jan 2022
Stock Market Staving Off Risk-Off - 5th Jan 2022
Gold and Silver Still Hungover After New Year’s Eve - 5th Jan 2022
S&P 500 In an Uncharted Territory, But Is Sky the Limit? - 5th Jan 2022

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

Pols, Pundits and Bear Trappers

Politics / US Politics Nov 10, 2014 - 10:22 AM GMT

By: Michael_T_Bucci

Politics

The mid-term election results in Americacan speak volumes if one only could hear the truth within the cacophony created by a hundred political pundits who mix moaning about low voter national turnout (lowest since WWII) with feigned "surprise" over GOP advances; pundits who never are at a loss for impressing the impressionable by mixing their stewardship with bewildering statistics, charts, graphs, demographic breakdowns; all of which, of course, leads pundits to issuing hearty expositions, predictions and projections of the future - a future based on their speculative punditry.


Punditry proves or disproves pet theories, validates pollsters, fills newsprint and air space, exaggerates the winners while further diminishing the losers. Punditry allows us to believe differences exist between the two political parties when they don't. Punditry reinforces our belief that we really have power over our government, its domestic and foreign policies (were you ever asked to vote on war and peace at any time in your life?). Punditry tells us what issues are important while excluding others. Pundits serve to help create our political reality and boundaries. Punditry is essential in placing before us a mirage of democracy instead of the real one threatened on all sides by voter disaffection; campaign funds stuffed by corporate, wealth-sector and K Street lobbyists; systematic exclusions of third party candidates, third party issues and, generally speaking, issues considered too sensitive in nature for (God forbid!) public discourse (war, peace, racism, rich/poor, NSA, drones, militarized police, Wall Street, the Fed, et. al.).

In U.S. mid-term elections nationally, we know how 36% of all eligible voters voted November 4, but we don't know why they endorsed one candidate or party over another, one issue over another, or why they chose to vote in the first place. More importantly, we don't know why 64% of nation-wide eligible voters stayed home. That question trumps all others and should lie at the heart of anyone's "punditry" for this season and the next.

In 2012, I penned an article titled, "Vote! Your democracy depends upon it." Days later a retired man and "Constitutionalist" argued that his protest against "government" was to abstain from voting. I urged that voting maintained the "institution". If we don't use it, we'll loose it! As a "Constitutionalist", he was undermining his own philosophy.

Did pundits explain why voter turnout by those 29 and under was dangerously low (roughly 13%)? If the future belongs to them, why are they boycotting elections? Trying to understand the mind-set of the "ME" generation, I queried Ron Paul youth and Occupy Wall Street youth. They are active, bright and very involved people who have energy and enthusiasm in common but are equally disenfranchised by the "establishment". The two-party system has effectively shuttered their right to be heard. They and other "out of the box" or "wing nut" types (labels given them) have no place at the table. And with little money to spend on political advertising, media ignores them. Consequently, voters do too.

Americans love money and, hence, love billionaires. How many pundits counted the hundreds of PAC and super PAC millions (totalling $3 billion) that was spent on both parties to gain proxy power for themselves and hence power over the electorate? Meanwhile some Detroit residents still go without water, which the UN cited as a humanitarian crisis. But a neighbor, a self-described "Confederate", argued these people didn't pay water bills and should get a job!" I replied, "In Detroit? Get a job where there are no jobs?" "Then they should move to a place where there are jobs," she quipped. Which brings me to Gov. Paul LePage and the state of Maine.

Voter turnout in Maine was considered very high against the national average. Indeed, it was exceptional being the highest voter turnout in the U.S at over 59%. But Maine pundits too scratched for answers, as one article that appeared November 5 at politico.com (a watering hole for uber-pols) by Colin Woodward, state and national affairs writer at the Portland Press Herald, demonstrates. Reminding a national readership of Gov. Paul LePage's infamous faux pas over the years and that Maine is a famously moderate state and LePage an extreme conservative, Woodward titled his front-page article, "How Did America's Craziest Governor Get Reelected?"

How on earth DID one of America's least popular and most divisive governors get reelected? Maine's ballot contained a referendum question on whether the state should ban the practice of baiting bears with donuts and other pastries (the ban was defeated). At the end of the politico.com article, Woodward, unintentionally perhaps, might have supplied the answer to why LePage won reelection. "The ballot measure [baiting bears] was defeated," he explained, "by some five points - about the same as LePage's margin of victory."

Maybe that explains why Mainers decided they haven't yet had enough of Paul LePage. Did bear baiters win it for him? Or do other pundits offer smarter theories? Or maybe no one really knows (except the bears).

But what I know for certain is this: if Woodward's hint by connecting the dots is correct, LePage bear baiters need to radically alter course. They need to start thanking the bears instead of shooting them.

By Michael T Bucci

Contact: mbucci@michaelbucci.com

(c) 2014 Michael T Bucci. All Rights reserved.

(Note: responses to emails might be delayed or not met.)

Michael T Bucci is a retired public relations executive from New Jersey presently residing in New England. His essays have appeared at The Market Oracle (UK). He is the author of nine books on practical spirituality including White Book: Cerithous.

© 2014 Copyright Michael T Bucci - All Rights Reserved Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.


© 2005-2019 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in