How to Keep the Philippine Economic Future on Track
Economics / Phillippines Oct 02, 2018 - 03:50 PM GMTBy: Dan_Steinbock
	
	
  
The Philippines  is on the right path, if the government can continue to balance between strong  growth amid international uncertainty, while pushing reforms that raise living  standards. Inflation and foreign investment tell the story.
  According to the just-released report by the  International Monetary Fund (IMF), Philippine real GDP grew by 6.7% in 2017 and  by 6.3% in the first half of 2018 on a year-to-year basis, led by strong public  investment. 
  The current challenge is inflation, which  rose to 6.4% in August 2018. That’s an average of 4.8% percent year to date,  which is above the inflation target band of 2−4%. 
 
The medium-term challenge is the infrastructure program, particularly foreign investment which supports investment growth – and which has taken off dramatically in the Duterte era.
The forces behind inflation
  Self-induced policy mistakes play a role in  higher-than-expected inflation. The IMF attributes more than half of Philippine  inflation to price increases in food, beverages and tobacco, particularly rice.
  The National Food Authority administrator resigned  a month ago after failures to purchase enough rice grains from local farms to  stave off the need to import. The IMF supports the Philippine policymakers’  plan to replace the rice import quota system with one based on tariffs, while  stressing the need to support small farmers affected by the reform.
  As monetary policy has been accommodative,  inflation has been driven by adjustments in excise taxes, rising oil prices,  the weaker peso, and above-trend growth. That’s why Bangko Sentral raised its  benchmark interest by half a percentage point last week. Inflation remains the  top concern of Filipinos, as evidenced by the recent Pulse Asia survey. 
  The effort to curb inflation must remain  elevated, however, because inflation may remain a challenge in the foreseeable  future. First, while real GDP growth is projected at almost 7% over the medium  term, inflation has also been projected at above the 4% upper target bound in  2018 and around 3−4% during 2019–20. Recent monthly figures exceeded the target  bound by margin that’s too wide. Second, in normal times, mild discrepancies  could be tolerated. But these are no normal times, as evidenced by the Fed’s  rate hikes, strengthening dollar and escalating trade wars.
  That’s also why Philippines is not alone in  this battle. In my last column, I showed how the  U.S. rate hikes and the dollar have penalized emerging Asian currencies causing  significant damage in Asia’s most rapidly-growing economies, including India,  Indonesia and the Philippines. 
  That’s why Indonesia’s central bank raised  its policy rate to 5.75% last Thursday. The Bangko Sentral has raised rates by  150 basis points since May, which is its most aggressive tightening since 2000.  Indonesia’s rate hikes this year also amount to 1.50 percentage points. India's  central bank has already raised its rate to 6.5% and is expected to hike ratesates  for the third time in October. 
The difference of capital flows in Aquino and Duterte eras
  Following surpluses before 2016, the current  account deficit widened to 0.8% of GDP in 2017, driven mainly by imports of  capital goods, oil and raw materials, reflecting strong investment growth. According  to the IMF, the Philippine current account deficit is projected to remain  manageable. In this view, Philippine output would stay above potential in  2018-20, even though the current account deficit may widen to 1.5% of GDP in  2018 driven by a continued rise of capital goods imports, mostly financed by foreign  direct investment (FDI). 
  Here’s the difference between the Aquino and Duterte governments: In the  Aquino era, early optimism and promises to change the FDI legislation paced an  increase of capital flows in the early 2010s. But these flows represented  mainly portfolio and other investments, not foreign investment. Eventually,  these capital inflows reversed into significant outflows. In the Duterte era,  early optimism and promises to bring in more FDI have paced a dramatic increase  of capital flows, which could be sustained until early 2020s (Figure).
Figure          Great Difference: Capital  flows in Aquino and Duterte Eras*
  
* Capital Flows (In billions of U.S. dollars, +  = inflow)
Source: Data from IMF(September 2018)
True, the current account balance declined in 2017, as the critics  complain, but it did so mainly due to higher investment, which reflects  Philippines attractiveness as an investment destination, and higher oil prices,  which are not under the control of domestic policymakers. Moreover, last year FDI  inflows more than offset the outflows in portfolio and other investment. 
  It is also true that international reserves have declined in the Duterte  era. However, Philippine reserves remain higher than in most emerging economies  worldwide - and significantly higher than in India and Indonesia which cope  with similar challenges.
That’s precisely why the overwhelming majority of Filipinos oppose any  effort at a destabilization of the Duterte government. That’s why they stand  behind its economic program and the war against drugs and corruption. They want  no return to the past. They want the economic future that has eluded them far  too long.
Dr Steinbock is the founder of the Difference Group and has served as the research director at the India, China, and America Institute (USA) and a visiting fellow at the Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (China) and the EU Center (Singapore). For more information, see http://www.differencegroup.net/
© 2018 Copyright Dan Steinbock - All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.
Dan  Steinbock Archive  | 
    
© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.
	

  