Shock and Awe II - The Consequences of an US attack on Iran

Politics / Iran Apr 04, 2007 - 04:21 PM GMT

The British and American public appear to being hyped up towards a possible attack against Iran . Despite recent rhetoric. the actual consequences of an attack need to be fully investigated before another ‘Mission Accomplished' photo opportunity turns into something far worse than the quagmire in Iraq, which so far is on target to cost over $1 trillion, with estimates being revised higher every quarter.

A ground invasion of Iran is not possible, not with the USA tied down in both Iraq and Afghanistan . Therefore any attack would only be ariel attacks, most probably limited to Iran 's nuclear and key military infrastructure. Still this ‘ Shock and Awe II' would involve thousands if not tens of thousands of missiles and ordinance. So on a scale similar if not greater to the attack on Iraq in 2003.

An attack on Iran will likely have the following consequences -

1. Crude Oil – This one is easy, the price of oil would likely jump to a new high, how high is unknowable, but the immediate response would be a price north of $80. the consequences of this on a weakening world economy is obvious – Recession 2008.

2. Financial Markets Panic – Financial markets seek stability and order, not chaos, an attack against Iran would reek of panic, the last throw of the dice before the Neo-cons lose control of the White House.

3. Unknown Knowns – Iran probably has anticipated an attack and it is highly likely some unknown strategic retaliatory action is planned. As to what ? I can only speculate that Iran would seek to draw Israel into another war with Lebanon but on a much grander scale. There is speculation that Hezbollah possessed advanced Iranian missiles to be launched in the event of an attack against Iran .

4. IRAQ – At this point in time most of the conflict against the Co-alition in Iraq is from the Sunni insurgency. Should an attack against Iran occur, then the fallout would be double if not triple the current level of insurgency as the Shiite's are the defacto government and majority of the population of Iraq .

5. Objective 1 – Get Rid of Iranian Nuclear Programme – An attack would reinforce Iran 's resolve that the only deterrence against attack would be for Iran to double its efforts to secure a nuclear deterrence regardless of the consequences.

6. Objective 2 - Weakening Iran , may have the exact opposite effect, out of the fires of 'Shock And Awe' we may in 3 years time awaken to an fundamentalist Iranian super state that engulfs most of Iraq and parts of Saudi Arabia . The Iranians sacrificed some 1,000,000 soldiers in the war against Iraq , and it is not inconceivable that another 1,000,000 will be sacrificed or as the Shiite ideology would have it Martyred in the formation of an Iranian super state.

I am of the opinion that an attack against Iran would be a disaster. Iran is not Iraq , it has not been disarmed over the last 10 years. It will have the effect of opening Pandora's box, the consequences of which we would have to live with for decades and in far greater magnitude than the fallout from the disaster that is Iraq .

I am more or less certain that this time, Britain would not ally itself in an attack on Iran , therefore this time, the USA would truly have to go it alone. The recent release of the 15 British Navy personnel is likely to further diffuse the situation in Britain.

I still consider any attack against Iran during 2007, as a very low probability, less than 15% chance of occurring. The only realistic way to deal with Iran 's nuclear ambitions is via negotiations and security guarantees, which is the primary purpose of an Iranian nuclear programme, i.e. to secure against another war similar to that which cost Iran 1 million lives during the 1980's when Iraq attacked Iran .

However, should the US attack Iran , then Gold and Oil and related companies are set to benefit. The stock markets (apart from the Military industrial complex), will take a hit. Which would represent a good buying opportunity, for adding to investments in the emerging markets, i.e. China , India , Brazil , Russia etc.

By Nadeem Walayat,
Editor of The Market Oracle.
Copyright © MarketOracle.co.uk 2007

The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Forecasting & Analysis online publication. We aim to cut through the noise cluttering traditional sources of market analysis and get to the key points of where the markets are at and where they are expected to move to next ! http://www.marketoracle.co.uk

Comments

Larry
06 Apr 07, 13:25

Re: Shock and Awe II - The Consequences of an US attack on Iran
The military in the u.s. as you pointed out (I believe) see such an operation as a disaster. And i have read this frequently and it is quoted as statements by recently retired Generals.

But those generals who would plan and supervise the bombing surely see it as a great opportunity for themselves as that part of the operation can go with few casualties or loss of equipment. Those guys are not getting stars doing missions over Afghanistan or Iraq as that's a different type of bombing and air operation.

And the administration if we can still stretch the definition of that word to include the neo cons are not working from a rational perspective. They have stated frequently this is a war against evil by Christians carrying out God's wishes. All fundamentalist think the same way as it is a disengagement from reality.

Now since that is so ludicrous we conclude they don't believe it themselves and just mouth the words for their own band of crazies.
But the more i read people like Seymour Hirsch who interviews the insiders the more i am convinced these people see it as their only possibility to regain control as they are becoming more isolated the nearer we get to national elections.

So just for fun entertain this question. Just who is going to stop them from bombing Iran?

And another advanced question.
Afterwards, when they are loosing who will stop them from using nukes? Russia, china? I don't think so. Though that day will come but they will let the Empire flounder first.

I will answer some of the above as lead in. Not the U.S. congress as george is the commander in chief. And he can attack who ever 'he likes'.
And not 'the people' as the neo cons have been building holding pens for us for some time. This was even voted on and approved by the congress ($300 ml to Halliburton) since they where labeled as needed to hold illegal immigrants. A few hundred thousand?

They already have those FEMA facilities standing empty but they insisted they will need even more 'containment facility's.
The public liked this issue as it was billed as anti immigrant which in this case is really racism; since we are talking Anglo's verses Latino's.

Best.
Larry

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

The Market Oracle is a FREE Financial Markets Forecasting & Analysis web-site.
(c) 2005-2024 MarketOracle.co.uk (Market Oracle Ltd) - Market Oracle Ltd asserts copyright on all articles authored by our editorial team and all comments posted. Any and all information provided within the web-site, is for general information purposes only and Market Oracle Ltd do not warrant the accuracy, timeliness or suitability of any information provided on this site. nor is or shall be deemed to constitute, financial or any other advice or recommendation by us. and are also not meant to be investment advice or solicitation or recommendation to establish market positions. We do not give investment advice and our comments are an expression of opinion only and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as recommendations to enter into a market position either stock, option, futures contract, bonds, commodity or any other financial instrument at any time. We recommend that independent professional advice is obtained before you make any investment or trading decisions. By using this site you agree to this sites Terms of Use. From time to time we promote or endorse certain products / services that we believe are worthy of your time and attention. In return for that endorsement and only in the cases where you purchase directly though us may we be compensated by the producers of those products.