China Afraid of Loss of Value of $2 Trillion of Reserves

By: Pravda

Dominick L. Auci writes: Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao is worried. His country keeps over $2 trillion of its foreign reserves in U.S. Treasuries. He's afraid that Obama's big spending plans will weaken the dollar and erode the value of those enormous assets. Given the dismal financial state of the rest of the world, that's a pretty high-class problem, especially for a devout communist. Jiaboa called on the United States to “honor its word, stay a credible nation and ensure the safety of Chinese assets”.

The Dalia Lama must have enjoyed at least a chuckle over the spectacle of any Chinese official lecturing anyone about credibility or honor. But grotesque hypocrisy aside, Beijing is indeed Washington's biggest foreign creditor and self interest as well as common decency dictates that debts ought to be honored, even if the borrowed treasure was acquired by the forced labor of millions, including women and children kept for decades in unspeakable conditions.

No one has cause to be sanctimonious. There is more than enough blame to go around. Governments of developed nations, from Tokyo, to Washington, from London to Berlin and from Moscow to Mumbai were all in the know and profited handsomely. But be that as it may, the bottom line is that the United States borrowed the money and the Chinese ought to be paid back as per the agreement. In fact, the full faith and credit of the United States Government demands it. But the key words are ”as per the agreement”.

For example, take gargantuan but nearly broke insurer American International Group (AIG) paying executives tens of millions of dollars in new bonuses even after receiving taxpayer bailouts of more than $170 billion. Whether or not anyone owns a single share of AIG, or pays a penny in taxes to Washington, the sense of smoldering outrage is practically universal. There is something about lavishly rewarding failure that makes human blood boil. But closer inspection of the absurdity uncovers the fundamental lie at the heart of predatory capitalism.

The argument goes that these millions aren't being awarded for failure, but for the efforts of exceptionally talented managers. These gifted souls really had little control over the events that bankrupted their companies, wiped out their shareholders, and threw thousands of their employees out of work. But for them, things might have been even worse. It's probably true that events, even great trends in the business cycle, had more to do with the demise of AIG than the decisions of any particular executive. It's also true that the financial meltdown caught 95% of CEOs, investors, and even politicians completely by surprise. But then, the converse must also be true, that the windfall profits reaped in the best of times are no more due to exceptionally talented individuals than the failures of the bust years.

The blunt fact is that AIG probably has hundreds, if not thousands, of dedicated employees who could do the CEO and CFO jobs just as well. And that means that the tens of millions of dollars paid in compensation, even in the boon years, is nothing short of a restatement of the old doctrine of the divine right of kings. Yet in boardrooms across the country and around the world, on an annual basis, directors on compensation committees mindlessly mouth the same mantra, that somehow exceptionally gifted individuals are worthy of such hire. No laws are broken, no plots hatched, no veils of secrecy drawn. It's all out it in the open, the bare, beating heart of capitalism as practiced in the West. And every lender, every borrower, every investor, everyone who owns even a single share of common stock or savings bond, knows about it and bought into this system along with its attendant risks, as per the agreement.

This goes for our Chinese friends too. When the leaders in Beijing decided to invest in US treasuries, they bought into the capitalist system. Like all investors, they didn't do it out of kindness, but out of self-interest. US treasuries are perceived to be low risk and therefore, carry a relatively low reward, a mere 3 or 4 % return at best. That's because it's unthinkable that Washington would ever actually default on its debt. America is the most affluent nation on the planet and the world banks in its dollars. And at the uttermost end of need, Washington can always print more money.

Pravda.ru

Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.

© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.